Fuel Cell Buses Speed Ahead


March 2, 2017

Image titel:


Fuel Cell Buses Speed Ahead


Fuel cell double-decker, © Wrights Group

Fuel cell buses emit no air pollutants or environmentally harmful gases. They can run an entire day without the need for refueling and offer operators the same flexibility as diesel vehicles. Fifty-four fuel cell buses and nine hydrogen filling stations were tested in day-to-day operation during the Clean Hydrogen in European Cities project from 2010 to 2016. The results were presented in London at the Zero Emission Bus Conference on Nov. 30, 2016.

The CHIC project (see also HZwei issue from January 2014) was the first to employ fuel cell hybrid buses in small fleets in regular operation. The vehicles possess a battery or a supercapacitor that makes it possible to use the fuel cell at low output and make the ride more efficient, e.g., by through regenerative braking systems. The energy amount that can be stored from it is much smaller than the capacity of the hydrogen tanks.


Models came from five different manufacturers. They were primarily smaller buses of 12 or 13.2 meters or around 39 to 43 feet in length – the latter with three axles – but there were also some articulated buses (18 meters or 59 feet). Their range was up to 400 kilometers (almost 249 miles) and they were used up to 20 hours a day. Most locations were subsidized by the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (see figure).

The project results have been documented and published as part of various reports evaluating different aspects of the project [1]. These reports include recommendations for future projects, a study on the acceptance of fuel cell buses among public transportation users and a rating of their sustainability. Additionally, the project led to the establishment of a dialog with critics of hydrogen and fuel cell technology. All figures mentioned in the following are based on project progress at the end of June 2016.


H2 filling stations

The buses were refueled around 61,750 times, which consumed more than 1,220 tons of hydrogen. It was possible to speed up refueling: Most of the time, it took fewer than 10 minutes to fill up a tank with on average 20 kilograms of hydrogen after one day of regular operation.

The hydrogen filling stations had an average availability of 97 percent. The lowest value at a location was slightly above 94 percent and the best was at 99.8 percent. The target of the project was 98 percent at each location. These values are a considerable improvement over the ones of the previous project, HyFLEET:CUTE (see HZwei issue from January 2010), when mean availability was at 90 percent and the lowest value was 61 percent.

As in previous projects, more than half of the downtime could be attributed to problems with the hydrogen compressors. Their impact varied throughout the cities taking part in CHIC: One location, which received its hydrogen supply in 500-bar high-pressure tanks from an external source, did not require a compressor and could avoid difficulties altogether. In other cities, there was downtime despite redundancies in place, meaning although two compressors were used at the same time. One reason was the contamination of hydrogen in the compressor and the subsequent components (partly even the bus tanks), which led to downtime for cleaning.

Fuel cell buses

The vehicles racked up more than 9.3 million kilometers or around 5.8 million miles. Their efficiency was notably greater than in the last generation, for example, because of the hybrid design. The 12-meter buses used 26 percent less energy than comparable diesel models. Whereas the 12-meter CHIC fuel cell buses required on average 9 kilograms of H2 on 100 kilometers or 62 miles (300 kWh/100 km), the vehicles employed during HyFLEET:CUTE had needed more than twice as much with around 18 kilograms.

Mean availability was at about 70 percent, missing the 85 percent mark by a pretty wide margin. A variety of components caused difficulties during operation, but the fuel cell only played a minor part in it. Additionally, the on-site maintenance and repair crews had not always been sufficiently trained from the beginning and were not familiar enough with the properties of hybrid and fully electric vehicles. Another problem – which impacted all manufacturers – was the inadequate supply chain for spare parts.

The challenge of spare part supply

Overall, the vehicles and filling stations have successfully mastered the test stage. But if there was downtime, repairs took longer than expected, as replacement required special components for which demand has yet to pick up and which suppliers often have not in stock. A few examples are the DC-to-DC converters and the valves in buses, filling stations and compressor heads, and the H2 sensors. Sometimes, there was only one manufacturer available and this one was based outside Europe no less, which caused further delays because of customs checks, etc. All in all, the supply chains for essential components are still insufficient.

As with vehicles and filling stations (without cars no filling station and without a filling station, no cars), the situation may lead to the proverbial chicken-and-egg dilemma: Long waiting times for spare parts will cause delays in introducing new technology to the market, and low demand means that production and availability will not pick up.


A sustainability analysis has shown that the 12-meter fuel cell buses make it possible to reduce CO2 emissions by 85 percent compared to diesel units during their entire life cycle (manufacturing, operation incl. H2 generation / supply, maintenance and recycling). To achieve this degree of efficiency, it is essential that the hydrogen is generated entirely based on renewable sources.

Studies estimate the direct life cycle costs of a fuel cell bus to remain above the ones for a comparable diesel version even in 2030 [2, 3]. However, the use of a diesel bus is associated with indirect health costs because of the emitted pollutants. Considering those, both vehicle types are at about the same cost per kilometer based on an estimate that was part of the sustainability analysis. The indirect costs, however, will be borne by all of society and not only by the bus company or its passengers.


CHIC has shown the feasibility of fuel cell hybrid buses for transit services and the suitability of the current generation of hydrogen filling stations. The barriers to the commercial viability of vehicles and filling stations have been identified and measures are being taken to remove them. This offers the opportunity of zero-emission public transportation on the road.

The CHIC buses are planned to remain in use during a new project called JIVE or “Joint Initiative for Hydrogen Vehicles across Europe” (see Diesel Exit – Global Advance of Electric Buses), which was launched in January 2017. Additionally, it will put more than100 new vehicles on the road, 50 of them in Germany. A joint purchase strategy of the bus companies is thought to contribute to decreasing the cost per vehicle further. A bid invitation for another project of similar size is expected in early 2017 too.


CHIC conference in London, © EE/CTE

Zero Emission Bus Conference

The conference provided indications of how the future of the technology could again be not in Europe but in the east of Asia. A representative of Hyundai Motor Group unveiled 2020 plans to create a fleet of several hundred fuel cell buses in the region around Korea’s capital Seoul alone. In comparison, some attendees were rather disappointed by the sometimes very cautious fuel cell-related announcements that European manufacturers made. At least, there was the showcase of a fuel cell double-decker prototype in front of the event location, London’s City Hall.


The project that ran from April 2010 through December 2016 and has led to the results presented in this article was supported with funds from the EU’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) for the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking – grant agreement no. 256848.



[2] FCH JU: Urban Buses, Alternative Powertrains for Europe, Brussels, 2012

[3] Roland Berger GmbH: Fuel Cell Electric Buses – Potential for Sustainable Public Transport in Europe, München, 2015

Author: Klaus Stolzenburg, Ingenieurbüro PLANET GbR, Oldenburg,

Here are interesting and current articles on the topic of hydrogen – stocks and the stock market!

Economic prospects for companies in the hydrogen sector | Future, stocks & hydrogen companies on the stock exchange and more…

Which hydrogen companies will prevail in the competitive market in the long term? Get tips and cartwheels and learn more about risks or opportunities. Our stock market specialist and expert author Sven Jösting reports critically, independently and competently.

Apr 15 2024

Cummins Engine – Emissions scandal ended by payment

The share of Cummins Engine brings joy: The share price rose to a new high for the year, after the...
Apr 15 2024

Ceres Power with strong partners

The main shareholders Bosch and Weichai are already counting on the English Ceres Power and their...
Apr 15 2024

Group rotation will drive hydrogen forward

Sven Jösting’s stock analysis #Shares from the crypto universe and from many technology companies...
Apr 15 2024

Wissing releases former NOW chief from duties

Background to the Bonhoff/BMDV split Things had quietened down on the Bonhoff front. But then new...
Apr 11 2024

Bloom Energy convincing in the long haul

Bloom Energy is planning a cooperation with Shell to use its SOEC technology for the large-scale...
Apr 11 2024

Ballard – Prospects better than current market valuation

The share price of Ballard Power is at an all-time low. The published figures for the fourth...
Mar 18 2024

Search for the ideal hydrogen storage

Interview with Thomas Korn, CEO of water stuff & sun Startup company water stuff & sun has...
Mar 15 2024

Is exponential growth slowing down?

Fuel Cell Industry Review 2022 Year 2022 saw fuel cell shipments creep up over 2021 numbers,...
Mar 11 2024

On the way to becoming a green hydrogen partner

Oman aims to score points with H2 infrastructure Wind, sun and loads of expertise – these...
Mar 07 2024

We can master a scale-up for green hydrogen

Interview with Dr. Kai Fischer, Director at RWTH Aachen The efficient scaling of green hydrogen...
Mar 07 2024

Frustration over continuing uncertainties

Interview with Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, CEO of Hydrogen Europe There is a lot that needs sorting out...
Mar 05 2024

“If ever there was momentum for hydrogen, it is now”

Interview with Dr. Jochen Köckler, chairman of Deutsche Messe “We’re bringing people together.”...
Feb 28 2024

H2Direkt: Blueprint for heating with pure H2

The energy providers Thüga und Energie Südbayern (ESB) as well as Energienetze Bayern have...
Feb 26 2024

Just switch over?

Hydrogen in the existing natural gas network Whether hydrogen contributes to the clean heating...
Feb 26 2024

Pilot plant for coating bipolar plates

At Fraunhofer FEP (Fraunhofer-Institut für Organische Elektronik, Elektronenstrahl- und...
Feb 20 2024

55 MW electrolyzer to decarbonize Saarland

Hydrogen Regions series: HydroHub Fenne living lab The power plant site in Fenne, Völklingen, a...
Feb 20 2024

Chicken feathers as FC membrane material

Feathers from chickens or other poultry could in the future help make fuel cells more effective...
Feb 15 2024

SMEs demand more security

Guest article by André Steinau, CEO of GP Joule Hydrogen After all, the Ampel Coalition leading...
Feb 15 2024

Accelerated expansion of renewable energies

RED III is here – Elsewhere, the wait continues Progress is being made at EU level – albeit...
Feb 12 2024

Picea 2 relies on lithium instead of lead

HPS presents new product generation The company HPS Home Power Solutions has unveiled a new...


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *